Sanket ki raneeti jo aapko jeet se adhik dhoka deti hai

[jhytde]

Your strategy makes sense, but because of the dynamic nature of the radical forex strategy genuinely effective use of mercantilism will be. In the market direction at any time, and loss that can come back to change. We need all confirm that we have a method, we tend to are with mercantilism.

[kalma]

Good observation. But is it really true? I mean maybe signal is true, but to a foreign terrorist organization, was too small and the pressure on the foreign terrorist organization until the TP

[jp64]

Forex mai indicator trader ko win se jyada loss karvata hai aur pahle muje bhi bahut loss hua tha.agar aap apni koi statergy se trade karo toh win ke chance bahut hai.

[kompa]

It is not as honest level. If you choose as a destination is the air very tight, because it turns out that the shining path visit first when you touch, though its motion path on the market can be relevant. The market moves to a hook or practices not optimistic or pessimistic. If this strategy seems to be unqualified, and then perform a reverse operation constant loose ends. Thus have a larger correction

[sutoyo]

i love this idea of reversing the signal of a failing indicator but the truth is that when we have an indicator that is not working, we tend to discard it very quickly instead of reversing the trading signal.

It is true as an indicator only know when buy and sell it, the indicator did not know when the price is already saturated so that indicators are not good if we were 100% believe in it, because all that is merely helpful not very decisive, so have to be careful when using indicators

[princeua]

There are some tips provided by John Murphy, which provides for 10 points and through these tips you can adopt a strategy of your own trading in the currency market, but there are some strategies old in the market, such as drawing lines length, width and direction of resistance and support These are the main things that could adopt a somewhat successful strategy.

[forumposter]

I think it is a fair strategy, but it does not matter how many merchants square measures adopted in a number of ways, with respect to certain ways of working, some of them do not seem to be. It depends on the user. It's that smart BRO, if it leads to a win than lose, you start with the $ 64000 signal even if it goes against the grain.

[shimo]

I think there is a correct program. It seems too strong, AR goal and what a terrorist group in the early stages, although the market also advances if they just touch it. The result is a moving market lot or the JAG system of optimistic or pessimistic, 13. And if it seems an invalid activity strategy, on the other side of the end of the trading loss. Just like the change

[kokolkola]

For example, suppose that you have a good plan. It seems to go the market can be so brilliant route 1 to the Unit visited the targets that are too tight when it touches. It happens after market sliding puzzle strategy is not the best and worst or shelves. And if that seems incorrect strategy looks like instead of doing business also continues to lose leads. So major repairs

[sanga]

Don't think it is a good plan. It looks like your goal is too hard, so even if your initial direction of motion of the market is also very good when there is a light that occurs as a result the market moves when you approach a jig or a terrorist group, or not I hit the optimistic and pessimistic. And if the strategy is corrupted, and then follow the reverse trade led to losses. In connection with the above amendments to the