and who tell you that only moving average is sufficient to define the market all the time and when you have not this in mind then understand it that it is a week strategy most of the time in market.
Printable View
and who tell you that only moving average is sufficient to define the market all the time and when you have not this in mind then understand it that it is a week strategy most of the time in market.
why don't you try to set the moving average values to 4,9 or 10,15, after that chart back and look for the cross that provides the best results for you, set you timeframes to lower value that you know it's best for you.after that you can determine wich is best for youQuote:
Originally Posted by dareking
moving average is one of the most classic indicators all the traders use it to identify the trend . I would like to use the Moving average 200 the price respect it too much
mujhe moving average ke baare me nahi pata kyun ke abi me forex trading market me newbie hun aur mujhe is ki professional chezon ka nahi pataQuote:
Originally Posted by dareking
i guss that msot of the resons that make me belive in forex market is that i mean better and faster results with more accuracy, or lower your timeframe to 15 min. it would be better if you test other crosses on h1 as it is a good chart for moving averages.
Moving Average is Good Indicator, It is Lagging and Repaint because there is new Data in the Chart every Second. If you only using Moving Average just for Entry Signal, then you are actually wrong and you will always get Late. make it as your Trend Direction instead for Entry Signal..
you need to change the time frame for moving averages and instead of h1 chart you should use m15 chart for these kind of trades as i guess you are a intra day trader...Quote:
Originally Posted by dareking
This is moving average,It is average and average number is always up or down the original,That is why these systems are no longer traded,They can be support or resistance some times.
Yet another moving average crossover system trading.. regarding the entries and i'd like if one i could clear my confusion up.
why don't you change the time frame to 30M, this will give better results as the period used to calculate will be shorter.Quote:
Originally Posted by dareking