Printable View
Dear i.forex members
On this Day i will predicted this pair have being bearish down SELL direction
the price is break Resistance and Trend Line and it is moving down side with having the long signal from the parabolic SAR
the market trend could remain in this position and I expected support resistance levels
A dot below the candles that indicates a downtrend direction
in addition to that we can see a SELL signal on the MACD indicator
I suggest to take short terms position on SELL today
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate
+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.+1 This is my main concern of Bitcoin itself as the dominant player theory. I actually do follow bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but am not bullish on the price. The problem with bitcoin is that there is absolutely no exclusivity to what it is. The problems with the bitcoin network have been highlighted tremendously. The limitation in the number of coins ever to be issued and the fact that there is 4-5 million coins lost forever, and the fact of the huge amount of energy used to support the network means that Bitcoin as the dominant cryptocurrency would mean supporting an extremely inefficient network with decreasing utility as coins are further lost in the system. Bulls argue this scarcity is the value, but I argue that the unhashed problems this will cause by draining liquidity will mean people flee using it as a currency.
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
I wouldn't know what the price will be in a year's time, nor would it change my mind if it were to double from here (which it could but also could just as likely drop back in half). What I question is many of you guys putting complete blind faith in one specific asset that already has problems as a cryptocurrency.
Resistance points and Support
points going down and moving
average also tell a about market
down
current price aur previous price
market ke down hony ka ishara
de rahe hain
If you cannot learn about market
trend then you will face loss
Always keep patience and get a
huge profit in your trading
Today Market anlisss...
all routine of the chart and indicator I have come to know that today the market will move on up way so all my brothers I will suggest that we should choose the option of buy for trading Hope you will follow me and will get more money because I posted this after checking the market carefully Good luck....
Today market trend: Bullish
Resistance and Support points are depend on market news
So before trading see indicators and then take a decision for trading
Always keep patience and get a huge profit in your trading
Come in forex trading and become a ßillionaire
Today
market trend: Bearish sell
Resistance points and Support points going down and moving average also tell a about market down
Current price aur previous price market ke down hony ka ishara de rahe hain
If you cannot learn about market trend then you will face loss
Always keep patience and get a huge profit in your trading
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate?
For me to act on investing my money in something, I should have a defined value metric that I should reasonably be able to predict or valuate. But the thing with Bitcoin is that I have absolutely no way of doing that. The entire market is controlled by a few whales and whenever people are hyped up in sentiment or retreating. If you want to argue speculating, fine, there is nothing wrong with that (I personally speculate), but even then why should I speculate on an asset class where I am at the will of sentiment, whereas if I were to target let's say a micro-cap stock where I have even gotten to read and understand the business they are in, and I have a better grasp of how exactly their value is derived, isn't that a better way to speculate? Please Comment.
Thanks, :1f607:
Today Market trend:sell
Current price aur previous price market ke down hony ka ishara de rahe hain
Resistance and Support points bhi market ke down hony ka ishara de rahe hain
Isliye hum ko sell main trade laga deni chahiye
" Best"